Friday, November
21, 2003
Artists continue the evolution of abstract painting
by Matthew Kangas, special to the Seattle Times
When is a painting not a painting, but a drawing or a sculpture?
When it is made by one of two abstract artists exhibiting this
month, Deborah Bell at Ballard Fetherston Gallery and Cordy Ryman
at William Traver Gallery. Both artists are stretching the limits
of what defines a painting, a time-honored undertaking dating back
to the earliest years of the 20th century.
For
that matter, what is an abstract painting? The dominant artistic
trend of the past century, abstract art developed in two main directions:
art that "abstracts" or reduces recognizable images,
as in Bell's case; and art that declares its own physical structure
and makeup, often through geometry and pattern or the frank use
of materials, as with Ryman. Both strains as practiced by Bell
and Ryman have led to colorful, strong and provocative works of
art.
Bell,
a 47-year-old Cornish College alumna and Seattle resident,
makes
great strides in her 11th solo show since 1990. Each painting
falls into one of two categories: those with a central, dividing "horizon" line;
and those with an undivided monochromatic background that is covered
by a scattered distribution of ovals, circles and other small shapes,
including ladders. "
Veil" and "Here and There" (both 2003) are strong
examples of the first type. In these works, with the halfway-up
divider, white dots are placed beautifully across the two-tone,
light-and-dark-blue backgrounds. "Dancer's Veil" is the
best of all, with quietly shimmering reds, oranges and yellows.
Since most of the paintings are square, averaging 4-by-4 feet,
such compositions seem less pictorial and more abstract. Even better
are the big rectangular and square paintings without dividers,
like "Goofy's Lookout" and "Swimming Pool." They
stride forth, declaring a random field of bright color with bouncy
or hovering darker and lighter shapes.
In
both cases, though, the outlines of circles rather than solid
shapes push
all the pictures toward a drawing category, setting
up a sketchy quality that doesn't measure up to the rich, painterly
backgrounds. With its evenly distributed range of dots, "Goofy's
Lookout" may be the direction for Bell to follow.
Ryman omits drawing altogether, offering, instead, multi-plane
wooden, plastic or metal supports garnered from found objects.
An abstract painting's normally flat, two-dimensional properties
are jettisoned in favor of bright-an-dark areas of color covering
intersecting and overlapping planes.
When
the paintings are small (1.5 to 2 feet square), Ryman's brilliant
color sense ignites and transforms such humble materials.
With
nearly every square inch covered by paint, coupled with such
undulating surfaces, the viewer's eye gets an exciting workout. "Red
Stairs," "Orange Perch" and "Green Stripe Wing" (all
2003) pop off the wall visually, pushing them toward sculpture
but without the full possibilities of three dimensions, so long
as they hang on a wall.
In
his fourth show at Traver since 1997, the 32-year-old New York
resident
refines such spatial and chromatic matters, but
with this
body of work, makes no huge advances in such modest constructions.
That is, unless one counts two larger works — "Art Spear," which
backs into a corner at 10 feet high, and a quasi-figurative work, "Wall
Snake," three simple stripe-painted wood scraps that climb
to 5 feet high. Closer to sculpture, but still paintings, they,
too, may point in a direction for Ryman to follow.
Caught in a fruitful, and far from frustrating, in-between
area, Ryman joins Bell in redefining abstract painting for
the current
century.
Exhibit
reviews "Deborah Bell," 11
a.m.-5 p.m. Tuesdays-Saturdays, through Dec. 6, Ballard Fetherston
Gallery, 818 E. Pike St.,
Seattle (206-322-9440). " Cordy Ryman," 10
a.m.-6 p.m. Monday through Friday, 10 a.m.-5 p.m. Saturday, noon-5
p.m. Sunday, through Dec. 3, William Traver Gallery, 110 Union
St., Seattle (206-587-6501).
copyright © 2003
The Seattle Times Company
home